[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO1O6sfdpWzULj_Yj1s_GTFiLaZFFjrrj_0RPAVe1hyk3uuSsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:23:05 +0100
From: Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@...il.com>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: 马麟 <linma@....edu.cn>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yajin_zhou@....edu.cn, syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: BUG: Out of bounds read in hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt()
Hi,
Den mån 22 mars 2021 kl 00:01 skrev Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<luiz.dentz@...il.com>:
> Or we do something like
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20201024002251.1389267-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com/,
> that said the reason we didn't applied my patches was that the
> controller would be the one generating invalid data, but it seems you
> are reproducing with vhci controller which is only used for emulating
> a controller and requires root privileges so it is unlikely these
> conditions would happens with hardware itself, in the other hand as
> there seems to be more and more reports using vhci to emulate broken
> events it perhaps more productive to introduce proper checks for all
> events so we don't have to deal with more reports like this in the
> future.
Keep in mind that when using the H4 uart protocol without any error
correction (as H5 has), it is possible that random bit errors occur on
the wire. I wouldn't like my kernel to crash due to this. Bit errors
happen all the time on RPi 4 for example at the default baud rate if
you just do some heavy stress testing, or use an application that
transfers a lot of data over Bluetooth.
/Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists