netdev - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210322090036.GB10031@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:00:36 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:37:14PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: error: 'ideal_nops' undeclared (first use in this function)
>  2015 |   memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:27: error: 'NOP_ATOMIC5' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'GFP_ATOMIC'?
>  2015 |   memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
>       |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                           GFP_ATOMIC
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   a89dfde3dc3c ("x86: Remove dynamic NOP selection")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   b90829704780 ("bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG")
> 
> from the net tree.
> 
> I have applied the following merge fix patch.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:30:37 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix up for "bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of
>  emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index db50ab14df67..e2b5da5d441d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
>  		/* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */
>  		emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
>  		im->ip_after_call = prog;
> -		memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
> +		memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
>  		prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
>  	}
>  
> -- 

I guess we can do the same as with the hyperv tree - the folks who send the
respective branches to Linus in the next merge window should point to this patch
of yours which Linus can apply after merging the second branch in order.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg