netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge port flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:03:26 +0100
From:   Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge port flags

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:52, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:45:03AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 20:25, Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com> wrote:
>> > Add support for offloading learning and broadcast flooding flags. With
>> > this in place, mv88e6xx supports offloading of all bridge port flags
>> > that are currently supported by the bridge.
>> >
>> > Broadcast flooding is somewhat awkward to control as there is no
>> > per-port bit for this like there is for unknown unicast and unknown
>> > multicast. Instead we have to update the ATU entry for the broadcast
>> > address for all currently used FIDs.
>> >
>> > v2 -> v3:
>> >   - Only return a netdev from dsa_port_to_bridge_port if the port is
>> >     currently bridged (Vladimir & Florian)
>> >
>> > v1 -> v2:
>> >   - Ensure that mv88e6xxx_vtu_get handles VID 0 (Vladimir)
>> >   - Fixed off-by-one in mv88e6xxx_port_set_assoc_vector (Vladimir)
>> >   - Fast age all entries on port when disabling learning (Vladimir)
>> >   - Correctly detect bridge flags on LAG ports (Vladimir)
>> >
>> > Tobias Waldekranz (8):
>> >   net: dsa: Add helper to resolve bridge port from DSA port
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid useless attempts to fast-age LAGs
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Provide generic VTU iterator
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use standard helper for broadcast address
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Flood all traffic classes on standalone ports
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge learning flag
>> >   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge broadcast flooding flag
>> >
>> >  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> >  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c |  21 +++
>> >  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h |   2 +
>> >  include/net/dsa.h                |  14 ++
>> >  net/dsa/dsa_priv.h               |  14 +-
>> >  5 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > 2.25.1
>> 
>> Jakub/Dave, is anything blocking this series from going in? I am unable
>> to find the series on patchwork, is that why?
>
> Tobias, the series went in:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=d7417ee918582504076ec1a74dfcd5fe1f55696c

Ahh, that explains that. I have been looking for it in the diffstat when
pulling net-next, but David pulled it in so fast that it probably flew
by before I expected it :)

> I'm not sure why the patchwork bot didn't go "deet-doot-dot, I am a bot"
> on us.

Yeah that is weird.

Thanks!