[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zgytk92s.fsf@vcostago-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:40:11 -0700
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mlichvar@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next-queue v3 1/3] Revert "PCI: Make pci_enable_ptm()
private"
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:20AM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> Make pci_enable_ptm() accessible from the drivers.
>>
>> Even if PTM still works on the platform I am using without calling
>> this function, it might be possible that it's not always the case.
>>
>> Exposing this to the driver enables the driver to use the
>> 'ptm_enabled' field of 'pci_dev' to check if PTM is enabled or not.
>>
>> This reverts commit ac6c26da29c12fa511c877c273ed5c939dc9e96c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>
> Without an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL this is not going to be very useful for
> your driver.
Unless I am missing something here, the commit that made
'pci_enable_ptm()' private didn't remove the 'EXPORT_SYMBOL' from the
function definition in drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c.
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists