[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mtutk69q.fsf@vcostago-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:40:49 -0700
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mlichvar@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next-queue v3 2/3] igc: Enable PCIe PTM
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:21AM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> In practice, enabling PTM also sets the enabled_ptm flag in the PCI
>> device, the flag will be used for detecting if PTM is enabled before
>> adding support for the SYSOFFSET_PRECISE ioctl() (which is added by
>> implementing the getcrosststamp() PTP function).
>
> I think you're referring to the "pci_dev.ptm_enabled" flag. I'm not
> sure what the connection to this patch is. The SYSOFFSET_PRECISE
> stuff also seems to belong with some other patch.
Yeah, I will improve the commit message to make it clear that this patch
is a preparation patch for the one that will add support for
PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE/getcrosststamp() and what's the relation with
PCIe PTM.
>
> This patch merely enables PTM if it's supported (might be worth
> expanding Precision Time Measurement for context).
Yes. Will expand the definition in the commit message.
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists