netdev - Re: [PATCH next-queue v3 1/3] Revert "PCI: Make pci_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874kh1jxjl.fsf@vcostago-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:49:18 -0700
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mlichvar@...hat.com,
        richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next-queue v3 1/3] Revert "PCI: Make pci_enable_ptm()
 private"

Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:20AM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> Make pci_enable_ptm() accessible from the drivers.
>> 
>> Even if PTM still works on the platform I am using without calling
>> this function, it might be possible that it's not always the case.
>
> I don't understand the value of this paragraph.  The rest of it makes
> good sense (although I think we might want to add a wrapper as I
> mentioned elsewhere).
>

Sure. Will remove this paragraph, and add the helper as you mentioned.
Thanks.


Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius