netdev - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Trivial spelling fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc1cde42-f0a6-8f1a-1353-9e767ae3cd31@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:39:36 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
        kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Trivial spelling fixes

On 3/22/21 9:46 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> 
> s/succeded/succeeded/ ........five different places
> s/revsions/revisions/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/header.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index 20effdff76ce..97a0eeb6d2ab 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int __do_write_buf(struct feat_fd *ff,  const void *buf, size_t size)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -/* Return: 0 if succeded, -ERR if failed. */
> +/* Return: 0 if succeeded, -ERR if failed. */
>  int do_write(struct feat_fd *ff, const void *buf, size_t size)
>  {
>  	if (!ff->buf)
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int do_write(struct feat_fd *ff, const void *buf, size_t size)
>  	return __do_write_buf(ff, buf, size);
>  }
> 
> -/* Return: 0 if succeded, -ERR if failed. */
> +/* Return: 0 if succeeded, -ERR if failed. */
>  static int do_write_bitmap(struct feat_fd *ff, unsigned long *set, u64 size)
>  {
>  	u64 *p = (u64 *) set;
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int do_write_bitmap(struct feat_fd *ff, unsigned long *set, u64 size)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -/* Return: 0 if succeded, -ERR if failed. */
> +/* Return: 0 if succeeded, -ERR if failed. */
>  int write_padded(struct feat_fd *ff, const void *bf,
>  		 size_t count, size_t count_aligned)
>  {
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int write_padded(struct feat_fd *ff, const void *bf,
>  #define string_size(str)						\
>  	(PERF_ALIGN((strlen(str) + 1), NAME_ALIGN) + sizeof(u32))
> 
> -/* Return: 0 if succeded, -ERR if failed. */
> +/* Return: 0 if succeeded, -ERR if failed. */
>  static int do_write_string(struct feat_fd *ff, const char *str)
>  {
>  	u32 len, olen;
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static char *do_read_string(struct feat_fd *ff)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> 
> -/* Return: 0 if succeded, -ERR if failed. */
> +/* Return: 0 if succeeded, -ERR if failed. */
>  static int do_read_bitmap(struct feat_fd *ff, unsigned long **pset, u64 *psize)
>  {
>  	unsigned long *set;
> @@ -3485,7 +3485,7 @@ static const size_t attr_pipe_abi_sizes[] = {
>   * between host recording the samples, and host parsing the samples is the
>   * same. This is not always the case given that the pipe output may always be
>   * redirected into a file and analyzed on a different machine with possibly a
> - * different endianness and perf_event ABI revsions in the perf tool itself.
> + * different endianness and perf_event ABI revisions in the perf tool itself.
>   */
>  static int try_all_pipe_abis(uint64_t hdr_sz, struct perf_header *ph)
>  {
> --


-- 
~Randy