lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210323083631.GE2916463@dell>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:36:31 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Rid W=1 warnings from OF

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:40 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > niggly little warnings.
> >
> > v2:
> >  - Provided some descriptions to exported functions
> >
> > Lee Jones (10):
> >   of: device: Fix function name in header and provide missing
> >     descriptions
> >   of: dynamic: Fix incorrect parameter name and provide missing
> >     descriptions
> >   of: platform: Demote kernel-doc abuse
> >   of: base: Fix some formatting issues and provide missing descriptions
> >   of: property: Provide missing member description and remove excess
> >     param
> >   of: address: Provide descriptions for 'of_address_to_resource's params
> >   of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming
> >   of: of_net: Provide function name and param description
> >   of: overlay: Fix function name disparity
> >   of: of_reserved_mem: Demote kernel-doc abuses
> >
> >  drivers/of/address.c         |  3 +++
> >  drivers/of/base.c            | 16 +++++++++++-----
> >  drivers/of/device.c          |  7 ++++++-
> >  drivers/of/dynamic.c         |  4 +++-
> >  drivers/of/fdt.c             | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> >  drivers/of/of_net.c          |  3 +++
> >  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c |  6 +++---
> >  drivers/of/overlay.c         |  2 +-
> >  drivers/of/platform.c        |  2 +-
> >  drivers/of/property.c        |  2 +-
> >  10 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> I still see some warnings (note this is with DT files added to doc
> build). Can you send follow-up patches:
> 
> ../include/linux/of.h:1193: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'output' not described in 'of_property_read_string_index'
> ../include/linux/of.h:1193: warning: Excess function parameter
> 'out_string' description in 'of_property_read_string_index'
> ../include/linux/of.h:1461: warning: cannot understand function
> prototype: 'enum of_overlay_notify_action '
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1781: warning: Excess function parameter 'prob'
> description in '__of_add_property'
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1804: warning: Excess function parameter 'prob'
> description in 'of_add_property'
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1855: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'prop' not described in 'of_remove_property'
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1855: warning: Excess function parameter 'prob'
> description in 'of_remove_property'

You don't want much do you! ;)

Sure, I plan to clean up all of the kernel with subsequent patches.

> BTW, there some more which I guess W=1 doesn't find:
> 
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:906: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank
> line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1465: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1469: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1473: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1517: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1521: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1526: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1528: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank
> line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1529: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1533: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:19:
> ../drivers/of/base.c:1705: WARNING: Definition list ends without a
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/Documentation/driver-api/devicetree:49:
> ../drivers/of/overlay.c:1183: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string
> without end-string.

What command did you use to find these?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ