netdev - Re: Patch version tags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210323170033.2e4411e9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:00:33 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch version tags

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:48:35 -0500 Alex Elder wrote:
> Simple question.  Maybe it's been asked before.
> 
> Do you prefer "PATCH v2 net-next ..." or "PATCH net-next v2 ..."?
> 
> Both work.  Which is better?  Which makes more sense to you?

FWIW I believe Dave has used the "PATCH net-next v2" format in the past.