lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCv0x02RQ=TQDjRNwAN1FJVFEwAbFYiif6JGtV=V4b2u0beKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:33:08 -0700
From:   Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v2 1/3] net: dsa: mt7530: setup core clock even
 in TRGMII mode

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 9:41 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:09:52PM -0800, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> > A recent change to MIPS ralink reset logic made it so mt7530 actually
> > resets the switch on platforms such as mt7621 (where bit 2 is the reset
> > line for the switch). That exposed an issue where the switch would not
> > function properly in TRGMII mode after a reset.
> >
> > Reconfigure core clock in TRGMII mode to fix the issue.
> >
> > Tested on Ubiquiti ER-X (MT7621) with TRGMII mode enabled.
>
> Please don't submit the same patch to net and net-next.  Anything
> which is accepted into net, will get merged into net-next about a week
> later. If your other two patches depend on this patch, you need to
> wait for the merge to happen, then submit them.
I don't mind waiting, but it's been more than a week now. When is the
next merge of net-next into net planned to happen?

Ilya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ