[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdV=vRGtNcmtdtnEVKLCSca4HyftNEntTGXAPQRFccuMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:49:10 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] udp: fixup csum for GSO receive slow path
> > > > @@ -2168,6 +2168,7 @@ static int udp_queue_rcv_one_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > > static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > > {
> > > > struct sk_buff *next, *segs;
> > > > + int csum_level;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > if (likely(!udp_unexpected_gso(sk, skb)))
> > > > @@ -2175,9 +2176,18 @@ static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > >
> > > > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct udp_skb_cb) > SKB_GSO_CB_OFFSET);
> > > > __skb_push(skb, -skb_mac_offset(skb));
> > > > + csum_level = !!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type &
> > > > + (SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL | SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM));
> > > > segs = udp_rcv_segment(sk, skb, true);
> > > > skb_list_walk_safe(segs, skb, next) {
> > > > __skb_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb));
> > > > +
> > > > + /* UDP GSO packets looped back after adding UDP encap land here with CHECKSUM none,
> > > > + * instead of adding another check in the tunnel fastpath, we can force valid
> > > > + * csums here (packets are locally generated).
> > > > + * Additionally fixup the UDP CB
> > > > + */
Btw, instead of this comment plus a comment in the ipv6 code that
points back to this ipv4 comment, I would move the explanation to
the udp_post_segment_fix_csum function itself.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists