[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210325011200.145818-6-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:11:59 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, damian.dybek@...el.com,
paul.greenwalt@...el.com, rajur@...lsio.com,
jaroslawx.gawin@...el.com, vkochan@...vell.com, alobakin@...me,
snelson@...sando.io, shayagr@...zon.com, ayal@...dia.com,
shenjian15@...wei.com, saeedm@...dia.com, mkubecek@...e.cz,
andrew@...n.ch, roopa@...dia.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/6] ethtool: fec: sanitize ethtool_fecparam->fec
Reject NONE on set, this mode means device does not support
FEC so it's a little out of place in the set interface.
This should be safe to do - user space ethtool does not allow
the use of NONE on set. A few drivers treat it the same as OFF,
but none use it instead of OFF.
Similarly reject an empty FEC mask. The common user space tool
will not send such requests and most drivers correctly reject
it already.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 237ffe5440ef..8797533ddc4b 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -2582,14 +2582,17 @@ static int ethtool_set_fecparam(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_fecparam)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (copy_from_user(&fecparam, useraddr, sizeof(fecparam)))
return -EFAULT;
+ if (!fecparam.fec || fecparam.fec & ETHTOOL_FEC_NONE_BIT)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
fecparam.active_fec = 0;
fecparam.reserved = 0;
return dev->ethtool_ops->set_fecparam(dev, &fecparam);
}
/* The main entry point in this file. Called from net/core/dev_ioctl.c */
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists