netdev - [RFC PATCH V5 net-next 5/5] ethtool: Add fallback to get_module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1616684215-4701-6-git-send-email-moshe@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:56:55 +0200
From:   Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Adrian Pop <pop.adrian61@...il.com>,
        "Michal Kubecek" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Don Bollinger <don@...bollingers.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...dia.com>,
        Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V5 net-next 5/5] ethtool: Add fallback to get_module_eeprom from netlink command

From: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...dia.com>

In case netlink get_module_eeprom_by_page() callback is not implemented
by the driver, try to call old get_module_info() and get_module_eeprom()
pair. Recalculate parameters to get_module_eeprom() offset and len using
page number and their sizes. Return error if this can't be done.

Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...dia.com>
---
 net/ethtool/eeprom.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c
index 10d5f6b34f2f..9f773b778bbe 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c
@@ -25,6 +25,70 @@ struct eeprom_reply_data {
 #define MODULE_EEPROM_REPDATA(__reply_base) \
 	container_of(__reply_base, struct eeprom_reply_data, base)
 
+static int fallback_set_params(struct eeprom_req_info *request,
+			       struct ethtool_modinfo *modinfo,
+			       struct ethtool_eeprom *eeprom)
+{
+	u32 offset = request->offset;
+	u32 length = request->length;
+
+	if (request->page)
+		offset = request->page * ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN + offset;
+
+	if (modinfo->type == ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079 &&
+	    request->i2c_address == 0x51)
+		offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN;
+
+	if (offset >= modinfo->eeprom_len)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	eeprom->cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEEEPROM;
+	eeprom->len = length;
+	eeprom->offset = offset;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int eeprom_fallback(struct eeprom_req_info *request,
+			   struct eeprom_reply_data *reply,
+			   struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct net_device *dev = reply->base.dev;
+	struct ethtool_modinfo modinfo = {0};
+	struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom = {0};
+	u8 *data;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info ||
+	    !dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom || request->bank) {
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	modinfo.cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEINFO;
+	err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info(dev, &modinfo);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
+
+	err = fallback_set_params(request, &modinfo, &eeprom);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
+
+	data = kmalloc(eeprom.len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom(dev, &eeprom, data);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto err_out;
+
+	reply->data = data;
+	reply->length = eeprom.len;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_out:
+	kfree(data);
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
 			       struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base,
 			       struct genl_info *info)
@@ -36,7 +100,7 @@ static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom_by_page)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		return eeprom_fallback(request, reply, info);
 
 	page_data.offset = request->offset;
 	page_data.length = request->length;
-- 
2.18.2