[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCCrEusRHwQMdKYx2yP-JgC4qkENpG_BCRQ5JHWD9=TEXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:29:32 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: lantiq_xrx200: Ethernet MAC with multiple TX queues
Hello Florian, Vladimir, Hauke,
first of all: thank you very much for this very informative discussion!
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:08 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> > Just to clarify, this port to queue mapping is completely optional, right?
> > You can send packets to a certain switch port through any TX queue of
> > the systemport?
>
> Absolutely, the Broadcom tags allow you to steer traffic towards any TX
> queue of any switch port. If ring inspection is disabled then there is
> no flow control applied whatsoever.
I think with the Lantiq PMAC and GSWIP the situation is very similar
skb_set_queue_mapping from tag_brcm.c seems very interesting.
a per-CPU queue is also very interesting since these Lantiq SoCs have
two MIPS cores
Many thanks to all of you again!
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists