netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: enforce that struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:37:23 +0100
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: enforce that struct_ops programs be GPL-only

Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:40:33PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> With the introduction of the struct_ops program type, it became possible to
>> implement kernel functionality in BPF, making it viable to use BPF in place
>> of a regular kernel module for these particular operations.
>> 
>> Thus far, the only user of this mechanism is for implementing TCP
>> congestion control algorithms. These are clearly marked as GPL-only when
>> implemented as modules (as seen by the use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for
>> tcp_register_congestion_control()), so it seems like an oversight that this
>> was not carried over to BPF implementations. And sine this is the only user
>> of the struct_ops mechanism, just enforcing GPL-only for the struct_ops
>> program type seems like the simplest way to fix this.
>> 
>> Fixes: 0baf26b0fcd7 ("bpf: tcp: Support tcp_congestion_ops in bpf")
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index 44e4ec1640f1..48dd0c0f087c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -12166,6 +12166,11 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>>  		return -ENOTSUPP;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (!prog->gpl_compatible) {
>> +		verbose(env, "struct ops programs must have a GPL compatible license\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> A nit.  Instead of sitting in between of the attach_btf_id check
> and expected_attach_type check, how about moving it to the beginning
> of this function.  Checking attach_btf_id and expected_attach_type
> would make more sense to be done next to each other as in the current
> code.

Yeah, good point. Not sure what I was thinking stuffing it in the middle
there; will fix and send a v2!

> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

Thanks! :)

-Toke