netdev - [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: enforce that struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210326100314.121853-1-toke@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:03:13 +0100
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: enforce that struct_ops programs be GPL-only

With the introduction of the struct_ops program type, it became possible to
implement kernel functionality in BPF, making it viable to use BPF in place
of a regular kernel module for these particular operations.

Thus far, the only user of this mechanism is for implementing TCP
congestion control algorithms. These are clearly marked as GPL-only when
implemented as modules (as seen by the use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for
tcp_register_congestion_control()), so it seems like an oversight that this
was not carried over to BPF implementations. Since this is the only user
of the struct_ops mechanism, just enforcing GPL-only for the struct_ops
program type seems like the simplest way to fix this.

v3: No change
v2: Move check to the top of check_struct_ops_btf_id().

Fixes: 0baf26b0fcd7 ("bpf: tcp: Support tcp_congestion_ops in bpf")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 44e4ec1640f1..3a738724a380 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12158,6 +12158,11 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	u32 btf_id, member_idx;
 	const char *mname;

+	if (!prog->gpl_compatible) {
+		verbose(env, "struct ops programs must have a GPL compatible license\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf_id);
 	if (!st_ops) {
-- 
2.31.0