[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210326123138.159616-1-liujian56@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:31:38 +0800
From: 'Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
To: <liujian56@...wei.com>, Kevin Curtis <kevin.curtis@...site.co.uk>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] farsync: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
index 686a25d3b512..5de71e44fc5a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static DECLARE_TASKLET(fst_tx_task, fst_process_tx_work_q);
static DECLARE_TASKLET(fst_int_task, fst_process_int_work_q);
static struct fst_card_info *fst_card_array[FST_MAX_CARDS];
-static spinlock_t fst_work_q_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fst_work_q_lock);
static u64 fst_work_txq;
static u64 fst_work_intq;
@@ -2648,7 +2648,6 @@ fst_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < FST_MAX_CARDS; i++)
fst_card_array[i] = NULL;
- spin_lock_init(&fst_work_q_lock);
return pci_register_driver(&fst_driver);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists