[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bce6d42-2f23-7c35-785c-e03ea5cb7e6f@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:40:47 +0300
From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
To: Don Bollinger <don@...bollingers.org>,
"'David S. Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
'Jakub Kicinski' <kuba@...nel.org>,
'Andrew Lunn' <andrew@...n.ch>,
'Adrian Pop' <pop.adrian61@...il.com>,
'Michal Kubecek' <mkubecek@...e.cz>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: 'Vladyslav Tarasiuk' <vladyslavt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V5 net-next 5/5] ethtool: Add fallback to
get_module_eeprom from netlink command
On 3/25/2021 8:13 PM, Don Bollinger wrote:
>> From: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...dia.com>
>>
>> In case netlink get_module_eeprom_by_page() callback is not implemented
>> by the driver, try to call old get_module_info() and get_module_eeprom()
>> pair. Recalculate parameters to get_module_eeprom() offset and len using
>> page number and their sizes. Return error if this can't be done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> net/ethtool/eeprom.c | 66
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c index
>> 10d5f6b34f2f..9f773b778bbe 100644
>> --- a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c
>> +++ b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,70 @@ struct eeprom_reply_data { #define
>> MODULE_EEPROM_REPDATA(__reply_base) \
>> container_of(__reply_base, struct eeprom_reply_data, base)
>>
>> +static int fallback_set_params(struct eeprom_req_info *request,
>> + struct ethtool_modinfo *modinfo,
>> + struct ethtool_eeprom *eeprom) {
>> + u32 offset = request->offset;
>> + u32 length = request->length;
>> +
>> + if (request->page)
>> + offset = request->page *
>> ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN + offset;
> The test 'if (request->page)' is not necessary, the math works with page 0
> as well. Keep it if you like the style.
OK.
>> +
>> + if (modinfo->type == ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079 &&
>> + request->i2c_address == 0x51)
>> + offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN;
> offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN * 2;
>
> Now that PAGE_LEN is 128, you need two of them to account for both low
> memory and high memory at 0x50.
Right, thanks.
>> +
>> + if (offset >= modinfo->eeprom_len)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + eeprom->cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEEEPROM;
>> + eeprom->len = length;
>> + eeprom->offset = offset;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int eeprom_fallback(struct eeprom_req_info *request,
>> + struct eeprom_reply_data *reply,
>> + struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev = reply->base.dev;
>> + struct ethtool_modinfo modinfo = {0};
>> + struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom = {0};
>> + u8 *data;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info ||
>> + !dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom || request->bank) {
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> + modinfo.cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEINFO;
>> + err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info(dev, &modinfo);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + err = fallback_set_params(request, &modinfo, &eeprom);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + data = kmalloc(eeprom.len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom(dev, &eeprom,
>> data);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + goto err_out;
>> +
>> + reply->data = data;
>> + reply->length = eeprom.len;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + kfree(data);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
>> struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base,
>> struct genl_info *info)
>> @@ -36,7 +100,7 @@ static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct
>> ethnl_req_info *req_base,
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom_by_page)
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + return eeprom_fallback(request, reply, info);
>>
>> page_data.offset = request->offset;
>> page_data.length = request->length;
>> --
>> 2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists