[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+W79=L=jb0hcOa4E067_PnWbnWHdxqyw-9+Nz9wKkOCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:24:33 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
iecedge@...il.com, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: trace jit code when enable BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:40 AM Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com> wrote:
>
> When CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is enabled, the value of bpf_jit_enable in
> /proc/sys is limited to SYSCTL_ONE. This is not convenient for debugging.
> This patch modifies the value of extra2 (max) to 2 that support developers
> to emit traces on kernel log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com>
> ---
> net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> index d84c8a1b280e..aa16883ac445 100644
> --- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> +++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax_bpf_enable,
> # ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> - .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> + .extra2 = &two,
"bpftool prog dump jited" is much better way to examine JITed dumps.
I'd rather remove bpf_jit_enable=2 altogether.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists