netdev - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Mar 2021 08:26:41 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

Hi Sedat,

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:50:55 +0100 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder why Stephen's fixup-patch was not carried in recent
> Linux-next releases.

It is part of the tip tree merge commit.  So it is not an explicit
commit on its own, but the needed change is there.

> Wild speculation - no random-config with x86(-64) plus CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y?

I detected it with an X86_64 allmodconfig build (which I do all day).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped