netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/6] mlxsw: spectrum_matchall: Convert if statements to a switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210329100948.355486-3-idosch@idosch.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:09:44 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jiri@...dia.com,
        mlxsw@...dia.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/6] mlxsw: spectrum_matchall: Convert if statements to a switch statement

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Previous patch moved the protocol check out of the action check, so
these if statements can now be converted to a switch statement. Perform
the conversion.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c
index 9252e23fd082..af0a20581a37 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ int mlxsw_sp_mall_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 
 	act = &f->rule->action.entries[0];
 
-	if (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED) {
+	switch (act->id) {
+	case FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED:
 		if (flower_prio_valid && mall_entry->ingress &&
 		    mall_entry->priority >= flower_min_prio) {
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to add behind existing flower rules");
@@ -267,7 +268,8 @@ int mlxsw_sp_mall_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 		}
 		mall_entry->type = MLXSW_SP_MALL_ACTION_TYPE_MIRROR;
 		mall_entry->mirror.to_dev = act->dev;
-	} else if (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_SAMPLE) {
+		break;
+	case FLOW_ACTION_SAMPLE:
 		if (flower_prio_valid &&
 		    mall_entry->priority >= flower_min_prio) {
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to add behind existing flower rules");
@@ -279,7 +281,8 @@ int mlxsw_sp_mall_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 		mall_entry->sample.params.truncate = act->sample.truncate;
 		mall_entry->sample.params.trunc_size = act->sample.trunc_size;
 		mall_entry->sample.params.rate = act->sample.rate;
-	} else {
+		break;
+	default:
 		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		goto errout;
 	}
-- 
2.30.2