lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:07:51 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Cc:     Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
        "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/23] ice: Add devlink params support

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 08:10:13PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:

> Maybe I am missing something but I see that a devlink hot reload is
> required to enforce the update?  There isn't really a de-init
> required of PCI driver entities in this case for this rdma param.
> But only an unplug, plug of the auxdev with new value. Intuitively
> it feels more runtime-ish.
> 
> There is also a device powerof2 requirement on the maxqp which I
> don't see enforceable as it stands.
> 
> This is not super-critical for the initial submission but a nice to
> have. But I do want to brainstorm options..

devlink upai often seems to be an adventure, can you submit this
driver without devlink (or any other uapis) then debate how to add
them in as followup patches?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ