[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@....gnu.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@...kelleys.org.uk>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
tboot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Thanks
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists