[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ygnhblb1gce4.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:32:35 +0300
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <jhs@...atatu.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <toke@...hat.com>,
<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] net: sched: bump refcount for new action in ACT
replace mode
On Tue 30 Mar 2021 at 01:53, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com> wrote:
> Currently, action creation using ACT API in replace mode is buggy.
> When invoking for non-existent action index 42,
>
> tc action replace action bpf obj foo.o sec <xyz> index 42
>
> kernel creates the action, fills up the netlink response, and then just
> deletes the action after notifying userspace.
>
> tc action show action bpf
>
> doesn't list the action.
Okay, I understand the issue now. I'll also add a tdc test for it.
>
> This happens due to the following sequence when ovr = 1 (replace mode)
> is enabled:
>
> tcf_idr_check_alloc is used to atomically check and either obtain
> reference for existing action at index, or reserve the index slot using
> a dummy entry (ERR_PTR(-EBUSY)).
>
> This is necessary as pointers to these actions will be held after
> dropping the idrinfo lock, so bumping the reference count is necessary
> as we need to insert the actions, and notify userspace by dumping their
> attributes. Finally, we drop the reference we took using the
> tcf_action_put_many call in tcf_action_add. However, for the case where
> a new action is created due to free index, its refcount remains one.
> This when paired with the put_many call leads to the kernel setting up
> the action, notifying userspace of its creation, and then tearing it
> down. For existing actions, the refcount is still held so they remain
> unaffected.
>
> Fortunately due to rtnl_lock serialization requirement, such an action
> with refcount == 1 will not be concurrently deleted by anything else, at
> best CLS API can move its refcount up and down by binding to it after it
> has been published from tcf_idr_insert_many. Since refcount is atleast
> one until put_many call, CLS API cannot delete it. Also __tcf_action_put
> release path already ensures deterministic outcome (either new action
> will be created or existing action will be reused in case CLS API tries
> to bind to action concurrently) due to idr lock serialization.
>
> We fix this by making refcount of newly created actions as 2 in ACT API
> replace mode. A relaxed store will suffice as visibility is ensured only
> after the tcf_idr_insert_many call.
>
> Note that in case of creation or overwriting using CLS API only (i.e.
> bind = 1), overwriting existing action object is not allowed, and any
> such request is silently ignored (without error).
>
> The refcount bump that occurs in tcf_idr_check_alloc call there for
> existing action will pair with tcf_exts_destroy call made from the
> owner module for the same action. In case of action creation, there
> is no existing action, so no tcf_exts_destroy callback happens.
>
> This means no code changes for CLS API.
>
> Fixes: cae422f379f3 ("net: sched: use reference counting action init")
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2
> Remove erroneous tcf_action_put_many call in tcf_exts_validate (Vlad)
> Isolate refcount bump to ACT API in replace mode
> ---
> net/sched/act_api.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
> index b919826939e0..43cceb924976 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
> @@ -1042,6 +1042,9 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
> if (err != ACT_P_CREATED)
> module_put(a_o->owner);
>
> + if (!bind && ovr && err == ACT_P_CREATED)
> + refcount_set(&a->tcfa_refcnt, 2);
> +
> return a;
>
> err_out:
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists