[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210330124009.GF5908@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:40:09 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] iommu/fsl_pamu: remove ->domain_window_enable
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The only thing that fsl_pamu_window_enable does for the current caller
> is to fill in the prot value in the only dma_window structure, and to
> propagate a few values from the iommu_domain_geometry struture into the
> dma_window. Remove the dma_window entirely, hardcode the prot value and
> otherwise use the iommu_domain_geometry structure instead.
>
> Remove the now unused ->domain_window_enable iommu method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Acked-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c | 182 +++-------------------------
> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.h | 17 ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 11 --
> drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c | 7 --
> include/linux/iommu.h | 17 ---
> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 220 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
> index e6bdd38fc18409..fd2bc88b690465 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
> @@ -54,34 +54,18 @@ static int __init iommu_init_mempool(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static phys_addr_t get_phys_addr(struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain, dma_addr_t iova)
> -{
> - struct dma_window *win_ptr = &dma_domain->win_arr[0];
> - struct iommu_domain_geometry *geom;
> -
> - geom = &dma_domain->iommu_domain.geometry;
> -
> - if (win_ptr->valid)
> - return win_ptr->paddr + (iova & (win_ptr->size - 1));
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /* Map the DMA window corresponding to the LIODN */
> static int map_liodn(int liodn, struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct dma_window *wnd = &dma_domain->win_arr[0];
> - phys_addr_t wnd_addr = dma_domain->iommu_domain.geometry.aperture_start;
> + struct iommu_domain_geometry *geom = &dma_domain->iommu_domain.geometry;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu_lock, flags);
> - ret = pamu_config_ppaace(liodn, wnd_addr,
> - wnd->size,
> - ~(u32)0,
> - wnd->paddr >> PAMU_PAGE_SHIFT,
> - dma_domain->snoop_id, dma_domain->stash_id,
> - wnd->prot);
> + ret = pamu_config_ppaace(liodn, geom->aperture_start,
> + geom->aperture_end - 1, ~(u32)0,
You're passing 'geom->aperture_end - 1' as the size here, but the old code
seemed to _add_ 1:
> -static int fsl_pamu_window_enable(struct iommu_domain *domain, u32 wnd_nr,
> - phys_addr_t paddr, u64 size, int prot)
> -{
> - struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain = to_fsl_dma_domain(domain);
> - struct dma_window *wnd;
> - int pamu_prot = 0;
> - int ret;
> - unsigned long flags;
> - u64 win_size;
> -
> - if (prot & IOMMU_READ)
> - pamu_prot |= PAACE_AP_PERMS_QUERY;
> - if (prot & IOMMU_WRITE)
> - pamu_prot |= PAACE_AP_PERMS_UPDATE;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dma_domain->domain_lock, flags);
> - if (wnd_nr > 0) {
> - pr_debug("Invalid window index\n");
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dma_domain->domain_lock, flags);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - win_size = (domain->geometry.aperture_end + 1) >> ilog2(1);
here ^^ when calculating the exclusive upper bound. In other words, I think
'1ULL << 36' used to get passed to pamu_config_ppaace(). Is that an
intentional change?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists