[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210330131149.GP5908@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:11:49 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] iommu: remove DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:38:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>
> Instead make the global iommu_dma_strict paramete in iommu.c canonical by
> exporting helpers to get and set it and use those directly in the drivers.
>
> This make sure that the iommu.strict parameter also works for the AMD and
> Intel IOMMU drivers on x86. As those default to lazy flushing a new
> IOMMU_CMD_LINE_STRICT is used to turn the value into a tristate to
> represent the default if not overriden by an explicit parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>.
> [ported on top of the other iommu_attr changes and added a few small
> missing bits]
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 23 +-------
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 50 +---------------
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 1 -
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 27 +--------
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 9 +--
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 64 ++++-----------------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 27 ++++++---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 4 +-
> 8 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
I really like this cleanup, but I can't help wonder if it's going in the
wrong direction. With SoCs often having multiple IOMMU instances and a
distinction between "trusted" and "untrusted" devices, then having the
flush-queue enabled on a per-IOMMU or per-domain basis doesn't sound
unreasonable to me, but this change makes it a global property.
For example, see the recent patch from Lu Baolu:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210225061454.2864009-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists