[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CYquzd4BBZBUM6ufWkPqfidctruWmaDROwHKVmi3NX2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:52 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] remove different PHY fixups
Hi Oleksij,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 8:26 AM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> changes v2:
> - rebase against latest kernel
> - fix networking on RIoTBoard
>
> This patch series tries to remove most of the imx6 and imx7 board
> specific PHY configuration via fixup, as this breaks the PHYs when
> connected to switch chips or USB Ethernet MACs.
>
> Each patch has the possibility to break boards, but contains a
> recommendation to fix the problem in a more portable and future-proof
> way.
I think this series moves us in the right direction, even with the
possibility to break old dtb's.
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Andrew, what do you think?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists