netdev - [PATCH 08/11] xfrm: BEET mode doesn't support fragments for inner packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210331081847.3547641-9-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:18:44 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] xfrm: BEET mode doesn't support fragments for inner packets

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>

BEET mode replaces the IP(6) Headers with new IP(6) Headers when sending
packets. However, when it's a fragment before the replacement, currently
kernel keeps the fragment flag and replace the address field then encaps
it with ESP. It would cause in RX side the fragments to get reassembled
before decapping with ESP, which is incorrect.

In Xiumei's testing, these fragments went over an xfrm interface and got
encapped with ESP in the device driver, and the traffic was broken.

I don't have a good way to fix it, but only to warn this out in dmesg.

Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
index b81ca117dac7..e4cb0ff4dcf4 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
@@ -660,6 +660,12 @@ static int xfrm4_extract_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	int err;
 
+	if (x->outer_mode.encap == XFRM_MODE_BEET &&
+	    ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb))) {
+		net_warn_ratelimited("BEET mode doesn't support inner IPv4 fragments\n");
+		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+	}
+
 	err = xfrm4_tunnel_check_size(skb);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -705,8 +711,15 @@ static int xfrm6_tunnel_check_size(struct sk_buff *skb)
 static int xfrm6_extract_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	unsigned int ptr = 0;
 	int err;
 
+	if (x->outer_mode.encap == XFRM_MODE_BEET &&
+	    ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &ptr, NEXTHDR_FRAGMENT, NULL, NULL) >= 0) {
+		net_warn_ratelimited("BEET mode doesn't support inner IPv6 fragments\n");
+		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+	}
+
 	err = xfrm6_tunnel_check_size(skb);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
-- 
2.25.1