[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210331083800.b3b2ewfgxklo76ri@apollo>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:08:00 +0530
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] net: sched: bump refcount for new action in ACT
replace mode
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:10:45AM IST, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:55 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> <memxor@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
> > index b919826939e0..43cceb924976 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/act_api.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
> > @@ -1042,6 +1042,9 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
> > if (err != ACT_P_CREATED)
> > module_put(a_o->owner);
> >
> > + if (!bind && ovr && err == ACT_P_CREATED)
> > + refcount_set(&a->tcfa_refcnt, 2);
> > +
>
> Hmm, if we set the refcnt to 2 here, how could tcf_action_destroy()
> destroy them when we rollback from a failure in the middle of the loop
> in tcf_action_init()?
>
You are right, it wouldn't. I sent a new version with a fix. PTAL.
> Thanks.
--
Kartikeya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists