[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210331000856.117636-2-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:08:51 -0700
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/6] mptcp: remove all subflows involving id 0 address
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>
There's only one subflow involving the non-zero id address, but there
may be multi subflows involving the id 0 address.
Here's an example:
local_id=0, remote_id=0
local_id=1, remote_id=0
local_id=0, remote_id=1
If the removing address id is 0, all the subflows involving the id 0
address need to be removed.
In mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received/mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received, the
"break" prevents the iteration to the next subflow, so this patch
dropped them.
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 73b9245c87b2..87a6133fd778 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -621,8 +621,6 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR);
-
- break;
}
}
}
@@ -695,8 +693,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
msk->pm.subflows--;
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
-
- break;
}
}
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists