[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210401093545.4055-1-lyl2019@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 02:35:45 -0700
From: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: dhowells@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Fix a use after free in rxrpc_input_packet
In the case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_DATA of rxrpc_input_packet, if
skb_unshare(skb,..) failed, it will free the skb and return NULL.
But if skb_unshare() return NULL, the freed skb will be used by
rxrpc_eaten_skb(skb,..).
I see that rxrpc_eaten_skb() is used to drop a ref of skb. As the skb
is already freed in skb_unshare() on error, my patch removes the
rxrpc_eaten_skb() to avoid the uaf.
Fixes: d0d5c0cd1e711 ("rxrpc: Use skb_unshare() rather than skb_cow_data()")
Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
---
net/rxrpc/input.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/input.c b/net/rxrpc/input.c
index dc201363f2c4..9ba408064465 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/input.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c
@@ -1281,10 +1281,8 @@ int rxrpc_input_packet(struct sock *udp_sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
if (sp->hdr.securityIndex != 0) {
struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!nskb) {
- rxrpc_eaten_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_unshared_nomem);
+ if (!nskb)
goto out;
- }
if (nskb != skb) {
rxrpc_eaten_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_received);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists