[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGiAjngOfDVWz/D7@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 16:49:50 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/9] net: dsa: tag_ar9331: detect IGMP and
MLD packets
> @@ -31,6 +96,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *ar9331_tag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> __le16 *phdr;
> u16 hdr;
>
> + if (dp->stp_state == BR_STATE_BLOCKING) {
> + /* TODO: should we reflect it in the stats? */
> + netdev_warn_once(dev, "%s:%i dropping blocking packet\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> phdr = skb_push(skb, AR9331_HDR_LEN);
>
> hdr = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_HDR_VERSION_MASK, AR9331_HDR_VERSION);
Hi Oleksij
This change does not seem to fit with what this patch is doing.
I also think it is wrong. You still need BPDU to pass through a
blocked port, otherwise spanning tree protocol will be unstable.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists