netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: tun: set tun->dev->addr_len during TUNSETLINK processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 05 Apr 2021 14:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     phil@...lpotter.co.uk
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tun: set tun->dev->addr_len during TUNSETLINK
 processing

From: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Date: Mon,  5 Apr 2021 12:35:55 +0100

> When changing type with TUNSETLINK ioctl command, set tun->dev->addr_len
> to match the appropriate type, using new tun_get_addr_len utility function
> which returns appropriate address length for given type. Fixes a
> KMSAN-found uninit-value bug reported by syzbot at:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0766d38c656abeace60621896d705743aeefed51
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+001516d86dbe88862cec@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 978ac0981d16..56c26339ee3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,14 @@
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/ieee802154.h>
> +#include <linux/if_ltalk.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/if_fddi.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/if_hippi.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/if_fc.h>
> +#include <net/ax25.h>
> +#include <net/rose.h>
> +#include <net/6lowpan.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> @@ -2925,6 +2933,45 @@ static int tun_set_ebpf(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_prog __rcu **prog_p,
>  	return __tun_set_ebpf(tun, prog_p, prog);
>  }
>  
> +/* Return correct value for tun->dev->addr_len based on tun->dev->type. */
> +static inline unsigned char tun_get_addr_len(unsigned short type)
> +{

Please do not use inline in foo.c files, let the compiler decide.

Thanks.