[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210406070659.t6csfgkskbmmxtx5@lion.mk-sys.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 09:06:59 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kehuan Feng <kehuan.feng@...il.com>,
Jike Song <albcamus@...il.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...rounds.com>,
Michael Zhivich <mzhivich@...mai.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
Subject: Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:55:41AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> Hi, Jiri
> Do you have a reproducer that can be shared here?
> With reproducer, I can debug and test it myself too.
I'm afraid we are not aware of a simple reproducer. As mentioned in the
original discussion, the race window is extremely small and the other
thread has to do quite a lot in the meantime which is probably why, as
far as I know, this was never observed on real hardware, only in
virtualization environments. NFS may also be important as, IIUC, it can
often issue an RPC request from a different CPU right after a data
transfer. Perhaps you could cheat a bit and insert a random delay
between the empty queue check and releasing q->seqlock to make it more
likely to happen.
Other than that, it's rather just "run this complex software in a xen VM
and wait".
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists