[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGwl2VvvGcmCciMn@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:11:53 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the net-next tree
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:48:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:
>
> net/nfc/nci/uart.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d3295869c40c ("net: nfc: Fix spelling errors in net/nfc module")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> c2a5a45c0276 ("net: nfc: nci: drop nci_uart_ops::recv_buf")
>
> from the tty tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Change looks correct to me, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists