Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB6795ABA4893C82D8A1BB5775E6759@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:38:26 +0000
From:   Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "christian.melki@...ata.com" <christian.melki@...ata.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO bus resume
 back


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> Sent: 2021年4月7日 18:22
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; christian.melki@...ata.com;
> andrew@...n.ch; linux@...linux.org.uk; davem@...emloft.net;
> kuba@...nel.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@....com>; Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO bus resume
> back
> 
> On 07.04.2021 12:05, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Heiner,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> >> Sent: 2021年4月7日 15:46
> >> To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>;
> >> christian.melki@...ata.com; andrew@...n.ch; linux@...linux.org.uk;
> >> davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org
> >> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; Florian Fainelli
> >> <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO bus
> >> resume back
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Heiner,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> >>> Sent: 2021年4月7日 15:12
> >>> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>;
> >>> christian.melki@...ata.com; andrew@...n.ch; linux@...linux.org.uk;
> >>> davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org
> >>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >>> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; Florian Fainelli
> >>> <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO
> >>> bus resume back
> >>>
> >>> On 07.04.2021 03:43, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Heiner,
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> >>>>> Sent: 2021年4月7日 2:22
> >>>>> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>;
> >>>>> christian.melki@...ata.com; andrew@...n.ch; linux@...linux.org.uk;
> >>>>> davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; Russell King - ARM Linux
> >>>>> <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> >>>>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >>>>> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; Florian Fainelli
> >>>>> <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO
> >>>>> bus resume back
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 06.04.2021 13:42, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>>>> On 06.04.2021 12:07, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: 2021年4月6日 14:29
> >>>>>>>> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>;
> >>>>>>>> christian.melki@...ata.com; andrew@...n.ch;
> >>>>>>>> linux@...linux.org.uk; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org
> >>>>>>>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >>>>>>>> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after
> >>>>>>>> MDIO bus resume back
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 06.04.2021 04:07, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Heiner,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: 2021年4月5日 20:10
> >>>>>>>>>> To: christian.melki@...ata.com; Joakim Zhang
> >>>>>>>>>> <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; andrew@...n.ch;
> >>>>>>>>>> linux@...linux.org.uk; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org
> >>>>>>>>>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >>>>>>>>>> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after
> >>>>>>>>>> MDIO bus resume back
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 05.04.2021 10:43, Christian Melki wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/5/21 12:48 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04.04.2021 16:09, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04.04.2021 12:07, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 4c0d2e96ba055 ("net: phy: consider that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspend2ram
> >>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut off PHY power") invokes phy_init_hw() when MDIO bus
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resume, it will soft reset PHY if PHY driver implements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> soft_reset
> >>>>> callback.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 764d31cacfe4 ("net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ8081") adds
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> soft_reset for
> >>>>> KSZ8081.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After these two patches, I found i.MX6UL 14x14 EVK which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to KSZ8081RNB doesn't work any more when
> >> system
> >>>>>>>> resume
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> back, MAC
> >>>>>>>>>> driver is fec_main.c.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's obvious that initializing PHY hardware when MDIO bus
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resume back would introduce some regression when PHY
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implements soft_reset. When I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is this obvious? Please elaborate on why a soft reset
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should break something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> am debugging, I found PHY works fine if MAC doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> support suspend/resume or phy_stop()/phy_start() doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been called during suspend/resume. This let me realize,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHY state machine
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phy_state_machine() could do something breaks the PHY.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As we known, MAC resume first and then MDIO bus resume
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> system resume back from suspend. When MAC resume,
> usually
> >>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will invoke
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phy_start() where to change PHY state to PHY_UP, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trigger the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stat> machine to run now. In phy_state_machine(), it will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> start/config auto-nego, then change PHY state to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHY_NOLINK, what to next is periodically check PHY link
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> status. When MDIO bus resume, it will initialize PHY
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hardware, including soft_reset, what would soft_reset
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> affect seems various from
> >>>>> different PHYs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For KSZ8081RNB, when it in PHY_NOLINK state and then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> perform a soft reset,
> >>>>>>>>>> it will never complete auto-nego.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why? That would need to be checked in detail. Maybe chip
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> errata documentation provides a hint.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The KSZ8081 spec says the following about bit BMCR_PDOWN:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If software reset (Register 0.15) is used to exit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> power-down mode (Register 0.11 = 1), two software reset
> >>>>>>>>>>>> writes (Register
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.15 = 1) are required. The first write clears power-down
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mode; the second write resets the chip and re-latches the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> pin strapping pin
> >>>>> values.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this causes the issue you see and genphy_soft_reset()
> >>>>>>>>>>>> isn't appropriate for this PHY. Please re-test with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> KSZ8081 soft reset following the spec comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting. Never expected that behavior.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for catching it. Skimmed through the datasheets/erratas.
> >>>>>>>>>>> This is what I found (micrel.c):
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 10/100:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8001 - Unaffected?
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8021/8031 - Double reset after PDOWN.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8041 - Errata. PDOWN broken. Recommended do not use.
> Unclear
> >>>>>>>>>>> if reset solves the issue since errata says no error after
> >>>>>>>>>>> reset but is also claiming that only toggling PDOWN (may) or
> >>>>>>>>>>> power will
> >>> help.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8051 - Double reset after PDOWN.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8061 - Double reset after PDOWN.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8081 - Double reset after PDOWN.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8091 - Double reset after PDOWN.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 10/100/1000:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing in gigabit afaics.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Switches:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8862 - Not affected?
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8863 - Errata. PDOWN broken. Reset will not help. Workaround
> >>> exists.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8864 - Not affected?
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8873 - Errata. PDOWN broken. Reset will not help. Workaround
> >>> exists.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 9477 - Errata. PDOWN broken. Will randomly cause link
> >>>>>>>>>>> failure on adjacent links. Do not use.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This certainly explains a lot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch changes PHY state to PHY_UP when MDIO bus
> >>> resume
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> back, it should be reasonable after PHY hardware
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-initialized. Also give state machine a chance to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> start/config
> >>>>> auto-nego again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If the MAC driver calls phy_stop() on suspend, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> phydev->suspended is true and mdio_bus_phy_may_suspend()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> phydev->returns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> false. As a consequence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> phydev->suspended_by_mdio_bus is false and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> phydev->mdio_bus_phy_resume()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> skips the PHY hw initialization.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please also note that mdio_bus_phy_suspend() calls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> phy_stop_machine() that sets the state to PHY_UP.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Forgot that MDIO bus suspend is done before MAC driver
> >> suspend.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore disregard this part for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Having said that the current argumentation isn't convincing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not aware of such issues on other systems, therefore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's likely that something is system-dependent.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please check the exact call sequence on your system, maybe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides a hint.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 7 +++++++
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c index
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc38e326405a..312a6f662481
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -306,6 +306,13 @@ static __maybe_unused int
> >>>>>>>>>> mdio_bus_phy_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  	ret = phy_resume(phydev);
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  	if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  		return ret;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +	/* PHY state could be changed to PHY_NOLINK from MAC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +controller
> >>>>>>>>>> resume
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +	 * rounte with phy_start(), here change to PHY_UP after
> >>>>>>>>>> re-initializing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +	 * PHY hardware, let PHY state machine to start/config
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +auto-nego
> >>>>>>>>>> again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +	 */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +	phydev->state = PHY_UP;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  no_resume:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  	if (phydev->attached_dev && phydev->adjust_link)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  		phy_start_machine(phydev);
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This is a quick draft of the modified soft reset for KSZ8081.
> >>>>>>>>>> Some tests would be appreciated.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I test this patch at my side, unfortunately, it still can't work.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have not found what soft reset would affect in 8081 spec, is
> >>>>>>>>> there ang common Description for different PHYs?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You can check the clause 22 spec: 802.3 22.2.4.1.1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Apart from that you can check BMCR value and which modes your
> >>>>>>>> PHY advertises after a soft reset. If the PHY indeed wouldn't
> >>>>>>>> restart aneg after a soft reset, then it would be the only one
> >>>>>>>> with this behavior I know. And I'd wonder why there aren't more
> >>>>>>>> such
> >> reports.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Heiner,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We have reasons to believe it is a weird behavior of KSZ8081. I
> >>>>>>> have another two PHYs at my side, AR8031 and RTL8211FD, they can
> >>>>>>> work fine if
> >>>>> soft_reset implemented.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As commit message described, phy_start() would change PHY state
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>> PHY_UP finally to PHY_NOLINK when MAC resume.
> >>>>>>> After MDIO bus resume back, it will periodically check link status.
> >>>>>>> I did below
> >>>>> code change to dump all PHY registers.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> >>>>>>>  #include <net/genetlink.h>
> >>>>>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -#define PHY_STATE_TIME HZ
> >>>>>>> +#define PHY_STATE_TIME (10 * HZ)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  #define PHY_STATE_STR(_state)                  \
> >>>>>>>         case PHY_##_state:                      \
> >>>>>>> @@ -738,6 +738,28 @@ static int phy_check_link_status(struct
> >>>>>>> phy_device
> >>>>> *phydev)
> >>>>>>>         if (err)
> >>>>>>>                 return err;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x00 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x00));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x01 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x01));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x02 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x02));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x03 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x03));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x04 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x04));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x05 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x05));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x06 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x06));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x07 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x07));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x08 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x08));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x09 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x09));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x10 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x10));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x11 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x11));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x15 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x15));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x16 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x16));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x17 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x17));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x18 data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x18));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x1b data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x1b));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x1c data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x1c));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x1d data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x1d));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x1e data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x1e));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("offset 0x1f data = %0x\n", phy_read(phydev, 0x1f));
> >>>>>>> +       printk("\n\n");
> >>>>>>>         if (phydev->link && phydev->state != PHY_RUNNING) {
> >>>>>>>                 phy_check_downshift(phydev);
> >>>>>>>                 phydev->state = PHY_RUNNING;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> After MDIO bus resume back, results as below:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [  119.545383] offset 0x00 data = 1100 [  119.549237] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x01 data = 7849 [  119.563125] offset 0x02 data = 22 [
> >>>>>>> 119.566810] offset 0x03 data = 1560 [  119.570597] offset 0x04
> >>>>>>> data = 85e1 [ 119.588016] offset 0x05 data = 0 [  119.592891]
> >>>>>>> offset 0x06 data =
> >>>>>>> 4 [  119.596452] offset 0x07 data = 2001 [  119.600233] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x08 data = 0 [  119.617864] offset 0x09 data = 0 [  119.625990]
> >>>>>>> offset
> >>>>>>> 0x10 data = 0 [  119.629576] offset 0x11 data = 0 [  119.642735]
> >>>>>>> offset 0x15 data = 0 [  119.646332] offset 0x16 data = 202 [
> >>>>>>> 119.650030] offset 0x17 data = 5c02 [  119.668054] offset 0x18
> >>>>>>> data =
> >>>>>>> 801 [  119.672997] offset 0x1b data = 0 [  119.676565] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x1c data = 0 [  119.680084] offset 0x1d data = 0 [  119.698031]
> >>>>>>> offset 0x1e data = 20 [  119.706246] offset 0x1f data = 8190 [
> >>>>>>> 119.709984] [  119.709984] [  120.182120] offset 0x00 data = 100
> >>>>>>> [ 120.185894] offset 0x01 data = 784d [  120.189681] offset 0x02
> >>>>>>> data = 22 [ 120.206319] offset 0x03 data = 1560 [  120.210171]
> >>>>>>> offset
> >>>>>>> 0x04 data =
> >>>>>>> 8061 [  120.225353] offset 0x05 data = 0 [  120.228948] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x06 data = 4 [  120.242936] offset 0x07 data = 2001 [
> >>>>>>> 120.246792] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x08 data = 0 [  120.250313] offset 0x09 data = 0 [  120.266748]
> >>>>>>> offset 0x10 data = 0 [  120.270335] offset 0x11 data = 0 [
> >>>>>>> 120.284167] offset 0x15 data = 0 [  120.287760] offset 0x16 data
> >>>>>>> =
> >>>>>>> 202 [  120.301031] offset 0x17 data = 3c02 [  120.313209] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x18 data = 801 [  120.316983] offset 0x1b data = 0 [
> >>>>>>> 120.320513] offset 0x1c data = 1 [  120.336589] offset 0x1d data
> >>>>>>> = 0 [ 120.340184] offset 0x1e data = 115 [  120.355357] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x1f data = 8190 [ 120.359112] [  120.359112] [  129.785396]
> >>>>>>> offset 0x00 data = 1100 [ 129.789252] offset 0x01 data = 7849 [
> >>>>>>> 129.809951] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x02 data =
> >>>>>>> 22 [  129.815018] offset 0x03 data = 1560 [  129.818845] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x04 data = 85e1 [  129.835808] offset 0x05 data = 0 [
> >>>>>>> 129.839398] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x06 data = 4 [  129.854514] offset 0x07 data = 2001 [
> >>>>>>> 129.858371] offset 0x08 data = 0 [  129.873357] offset 0x09 data
> >>>>>>> = 0 [ 129.876954] offset 0x10 data = 0 [  129.880472] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x11 data =
> >>>>>>> 0 [  129.896450] offset 0x15 data = 0 [  129.900038] offset 0x16
> >>>>>>> data =
> >>>>>>> 202 [  129.915041] offset 0x17 data = 5c02 [  129.918889] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x18 data = 801 [  129.932735] offset 0x1b data = 0 [
> >>>>>>> 129.946830] offset 0x1c data = 0 [  129.950424] offset 0x1d data
> >>>>>>> = 0 [ 129.964585] offset 0x1e data = 0 [  129.968192] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x1f data =
> >>>>>>> 8190 [ 129.972938] [  129.972938] [  130.425125] offset 0x00
> >>>>>>> data =
> >>>>>>> 100 [ 130.428889] offset 0x01 data = 784d [  130.442671] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x02 data =
> >>>>>>> 22 [  130.446360] offset 0x03 data = 1560 [  130.450142] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x04 data = 8061 [  130.467207] offset 0x05 data = 0 [
> >>>>>>> 130.470789] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x06 data = 4 [  130.485071] offset 0x07 data = 2001 [
> >>>>>>> 130.488934] offset 0x08 data = 0 [  130.504320] offset 0x09 data
> >>>>>>> = 0 [ 130.507911] offset 0x10 data = 0 [  130.520950] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x11 data =
> >>>>>>> 0 [  130.532865] offset 0x15 data = 0 [  130.536461] offset 0x16
> >>>>>>> data =
> >>>>>>> 202 [  130.540156] offset 0x17 data = 3c02 [  130.557218] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x18 data = 801 [  130.560987] offset 0x1b data = 0 [
> >>>>>>> 130.575158] offset 0x1c data = 1 [  130.578754] offset 0x1d data
> >>>>>>> = 0 [ 130.593543] offset 0x1e data = 115 [  130.597312] offset
> >>>>>>> 0x1f data = 8190
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We can see that BMCR and BMSR changes from 0x1100,0x7849 to
> >>>>> 0x100,0x784d (BMCR[12] bit and BMSR[2]), and loop it.
> >>>>>>> Above process is auto-nego enabled, link is down, auto-nego is
> >>>>>>> disabled, link
> >>>>> is up. And auto-nego complete bit is always 0.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> PHY seems become unstable if soft reset after start/config
> >>>>>>> auto-nego. I also
> >>>>> want to fix it in micrel driver, but failed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Waiting for ANEG_COMPLETE to be set wouldn't be a good option.
> >>>>>> Aneg may never complete for different reasons, e.g. no physical
> >>>>>> link. And even if we use a timeout this may add unwanted delays.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you have any other insights that can help me further locate
> >>>>>>> the
> >> issue?
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think current MAC/PHY PM handling isn't perfect. Often we have
> >>>>>> the following
> >>>>>> scenario:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *suspend*
> >>>>>> 1. PHY is suspended (mdio_bus_phy_suspend) 2. MAC suspend
> >>>>>> callback (typically involving phy_stop())
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *resume*
> >>>>>> 1. MAC resume callback (typically involving phy_start()) 2. PHY
> >>>>>> is resumed (mdio_bus_phy_resume), incl. calling phy_init_hw()
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Calling phy_init_hw() after phy_start() doesn't look right.
> >>>>>> It seems to work in most cases, but there's a certain risk that
> >>>>>> phy_init_hw() overwrites something, e.g. the advertised modes.
> >>>>>> I think we have two valid scenarios:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. phylib PM callbacks are used, then the MAC driver shouldn't
> >>>>>>    touch the PHY in its PM callbacks, especially not call
> >>>>>>    phy_stop/phy_start.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. MAC PM callbacks take care also of the PHY. Then I think we would
> >>>>>>    need a flag at the phy_device telling it to make the PHY PM
> >>>>>>    callbacks a no-op.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrew, Russell: What do you think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>> Joakim Zhang
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Heiner
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Based on scenario 1 you can also try the following.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>>>> index 3db882322..cdf9160fc 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>>>> @@ -3805,7 +3805,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> fec_suspend(struct
> >>>>> device *dev)
> >>>>>  	if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> >>>>>  		if (fep->wol_flag & FEC_WOL_FLAG_ENABLE)
> >>>>>  			fep->wol_flag |= FEC_WOL_FLAG_SLEEP_ON;
> >>>>> -		phy_stop(ndev->phydev);
> >>>>>  		napi_disable(&fep->napi);
> >>>>>  		netif_tx_lock_bh(ndev);
> >>>>>  		netif_device_detach(ndev);
> >>>>> @@ -3864,7 +3863,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> fec_resume(struct
> >>>>> device *dev)
> >>>>>  		netif_device_attach(ndev);
> >>>>>  		netif_tx_unlock_bh(ndev);
> >>>>>  		napi_enable(&fep->napi);
> >>>>> -		phy_start(ndev->phydev);
> >>>>>  	}
> >>>>>  	rtnl_unlock();
> >>>>
> >>>> As I described in commit message:
> >>>>
> >>>> "When I am debugging, I found PHY works fine if MAC doesn't support
> >>> suspend/resume or phy_stop()/phy_start() doesn't been called during
> >>> suspend/resume. This let me realize, PHY state machine
> >>> phy_state_machine() could do something breaks the PHY."
> >>>>
> >>>> So I have tried your above code change before, and it works. But it
> >>>> is a very
> >>> common phenomenon that MAC suspend/resume invokes phy_stop/start
> or
> >>> phylink_stop/start, and it's been around for a long time.
> >>>>
> >>>> As the scenarios you list, it is indeed unreasonable to soft reset
> >>>> or config PHY
> >>> after calling phy_start_aneg() in state machine. PHY state should be
> >>> PHY_UP after calling phy_init_hw(), It seems more reasonable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Joakim Zhang
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> 2.31.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Following is a draft patch for scenario 1:
> >>> Make PHY PM a no-op if MAC manages PHY PM.
> >>> Can you give it a try?
> >>>
> >>
> >> It can work for my case. Thanks.
> >
> > I have another question, if it is possible to change the suspend/resume
> sequence?
> > MAC should suspend before MDIO bus, and MDIO bus should resume before
> MAC. For some MACs, they need PHY feed clocks. It seems more reasonable.
> >
> 
> On the other hand we have cases where the PHY depends on the MAC.
> If the MAC suspends first, the MDIO bus (and therefore the PHY) may not be
> accessible any longer. Therefore it's not that easy.
Yes, right.

> This speaks for my proposal to be able to make the PHY PM ops no-ops.
> Then we can handle MAC + PHY PM in the MAC PM callbacks and consider any
> such dependency.
Yes, this can cover different cases.

> I don't think we can change the PM ordering, AFAIK the PM core does it based
> on registration order of devices.
Learn more. Thanks.

Do you plan to send a formal patch for this?

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> 
> > Best Regards,
> > Joakim Zhang
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Joakim Zhang
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>> b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c index a009d1769..73d29fd5e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>> @@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ static __maybe_unused int
> >>> mdio_bus_phy_suspend(struct device *dev)  {
> >>>  	struct phy_device *phydev = to_phy_device(dev);
> >>>
> >>> +	if (phydev->mac_managed_pm)
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +
> >>>  	/* We must stop the state machine manually, otherwise it stops out
> of
> >>>  	 * control, possibly with the phydev->lock held. Upon resume, netdev
> >>>  	 * may call phy routines that try to grab the same lock, and that
> >>> may @@
> >>> -294,6 +297,9 @@ static __maybe_unused int
> >>> mdio_bus_phy_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>>  	struct phy_device *phydev = to_phy_device(dev);
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>
> >>> +	if (phydev->mac_managed_pm)
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +
> >>>  	if (!phydev->suspended_by_mdio_bus)
> >>>  		goto no_resume;
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h index
> >>> 8e2cf84b2..46702af18 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/phy.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/phy.h
> >>> @@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ struct phy_device {
> >>>  	unsigned loopback_enabled:1;
> >>>  	unsigned downshifted_rate:1;
> >>>  	unsigned is_on_sfp_module:1;
> >>> +	unsigned mac_managed_pm:1;
> >>>
> >>>  	unsigned autoneg:1;
> >>>  	/* The most recently read link state */
> >>> --
> >>> 2.31.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>> index 3db882322..70aea9c27 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >>> @@ -2048,6 +2048,8 @@ static int fec_enet_mii_probe(struct
> >>> net_device
> >>> *ndev)
> >>>  	fep->link = 0;
> >>>  	fep->full_duplex = 0;
> >>>
> >>> +	phy_dev->mac_managed_pm = 1;
> >>> +
> >>>  	phy_attached_info(phy_dev);
> >>>
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>> @@ -3864,6 +3866,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused fec_resume(struct
> >>> device *dev)
> >>>  		netif_device_attach(ndev);
> >>>  		netif_tx_unlock_bh(ndev);
> >>>  		napi_enable(&fep->napi);
> >>> +		phy_init_hw(ndev->phydev);
> >>>  		phy_start(ndev->phydev);
> >>>  	}
> >>>  	rtnl_unlock();
> >>> --
> >>> 2.31.1
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists