[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23e44d40b89a4ab69a4d3b6336b5dc51@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:06:18 +0000
From: "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 00/23] Add Intel Ethernet Protocol Driver for RDMA
(irdma)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] Add Intel Ethernet Protocol Driver for RDMA
> (irdma)
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:30:23PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
>
> > Hi Jason - I think its because I used --irreversible-delete flag in git format-patch
> for review that this one doesn't apply.
>
> I doubt it
The documentation hints at it.
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch
-D
--irreversible-delete
Omit the preimage for deletes, i.e. print only the header but not the diff between the preimage and /dev/null. The resulting patch is not meant to be applied with patch or git apply; this is solely for people who want to just concentrate on reviewing the text after the change. In addition, the output obviously lacks enough information to apply such a patch in reverse, even manually, hence the name of the option.
>
> > I can resend without it if your trying to apply.
>
> Now it is too big to go to the mailing lists
>
It is showing now.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/patch/20210407001502.1890-23-shiraz.saleem@intel.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists