[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210407224324.GH282464@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:43:24 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Cc: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/23] iidc: Introduce iidc.h
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:58:49PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/23] iidc: Introduce iidc.h
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:01:03PM -0500, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> >
> > > +/* Following APIs are implemented by core PCI driver */ struct
> > > +iidc_core_ops {
> > > + /* APIs to allocate resources such as VEB, VSI, Doorbell queues,
> > > + * completion queues, Tx/Rx queues, etc...
> > > + */
> > > + int (*alloc_res)(struct iidc_core_dev_info *cdev_info,
> > > + struct iidc_res *res,
> > > + int partial_acceptable);
> > > + int (*free_res)(struct iidc_core_dev_info *cdev_info,
> > > + struct iidc_res *res);
> > > +
> > > + int (*request_reset)(struct iidc_core_dev_info *cdev_info,
> > > + enum iidc_reset_type reset_type);
> > > +
> > > + int (*update_vport_filter)(struct iidc_core_dev_info *cdev_info,
> > > + u16 vport_id, bool enable);
> > > + int (*vc_send)(struct iidc_core_dev_info *cdev_info, u32 vf_id, u8 *msg,
> > > + u16 len);
> > > +};
> >
> > What is this? There is only one implementation:
> >
> > static const struct iidc_core_ops ops = {
> > .alloc_res = ice_cdev_info_alloc_res,
> > .free_res = ice_cdev_info_free_res,
> > .request_reset = ice_cdev_info_request_reset,
> > .update_vport_filter = ice_cdev_info_update_vsi_filter,
> > .vc_send = ice_cdev_info_vc_send,
> > };
> >
> > So export and call the functions directly.
>
> No. Then we end up requiring ice to be loaded even when just want to
> use irdma with x722 [whose ethernet driver is "i40e"].
So what? What does it matter to load a few extra kb of modules?
If you had both drivers use the same ops interface you'd have an
argument.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists