[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210407002734.GA30525@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:27:34 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
drivers@...sando.io, Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...sando.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] ionic: add hw timestamp support files
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:18:00PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 4/5/21 11:17 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 09:16:39AM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> > > On 4/4/21 4:05 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > > This check is unneeded, because the ioctl layer never passes NULL here.
> > > Yes, the ioctl layer never calls this with NULL, but we call it from within
> > > the driver when we spin operations back up after a FW reset.
> > So why not avoid the special case and pass a proper request?
>
> We do this because our firmware reset path is a special case that we have to
> handle, and we do so by replaying the previous configuration request.
> Passing the NULL request gives the code the ability to watch for this case
> while keeping the special case handling simple: the code that drives the
> replay logic doesn't need to know the hwstamp details, it just needs to
> signal the replay and let the hwstamp code keep track of its own data and
> request history.
>
> I can update the comment to make that replay case more obvious.
No, please, I am asking you to provide a hwtstamp_config from your
driver. What is so hard about that?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists