netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 09/14] bpd: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:57:09 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, shayagr@...zon.com,
        sameehj@...zon.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
        brouer@...hat.com, echaudro@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        alexander.duyck@...il.com, saeed@...nel.org,
        maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 09/14] bpd: add multi-buffer support to xdp
 copy helpers

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:51:01PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> 
> This patch adds support for multi-buffer for the following helpers:
>   - bpf_xdp_output()
>   - bpf_perf_event_output()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> index a038e827f850..d5a5f603d252 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct xdp_buff {
>  	void *data_hard_start;
>  	unsigned long handle;
>  	struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
> +	__u32 frame_length;

This patch will not work without patch 10, so could you change the order?

>  } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>  
>  struct meta {
> @@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(trace_on_entry, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>  	void *data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
>  
>  	meta.ifindex = xdp->rxq->dev->ifindex;
> -	meta.pkt_len = data_end - data;
> +	meta.pkt_len = xdp->frame_length;
>  	bpf_xdp_output(xdp, &perf_buf_map,
>  		       ((__u64) meta.pkt_len << 32) |
>  		       BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU,
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>