[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210408115347.GO7405@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:53:47 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/5] Get rid of custom made module dependency
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:44:45PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > In my internal testing, I am seeing a crash using the 3rd patch. I am
> > spending a few cycles on debugging it. expect my input in a day or so.
>
> Can you please post the kernel crash report here?
> I don't see how function rename in patch #3 can cause to the crash.
I looked too, I'm also quite surprised that 1,2,3 alone have a
bug.. Is there some condition where ulp_probe can be null?
Ugh the is_bnxt_re_dev() is horribly gross too
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists