| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210409223801.104657-5-mcroce@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:38:00 +0200
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@...lsio.com>,
Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mirko Lindner <mlindner@...vell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>,
Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] mvpp2: recycle buffers
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
Use the new recycling API for page_pool.
In a drop rate test, the packet rate is more than doubled,
from 962 Kpps to 2047 Kpps.
perf top on a stock system shows:
Overhead Shared Object Symbol
30.67% [kernel] [k] page_pool_release_page
8.37% [kernel] [k] get_page_from_freelist
7.34% [kernel] [k] free_unref_page
6.47% [mvpp2] [k] mvpp2_rx
4.69% [kernel] [k] eth_type_trans
4.55% [kernel] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
4.40% [kernel] [k] build_skb
4.29% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_free
4.00% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
3.81% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive
With packet rate stable at 962 Kpps:
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 477.4 Mbps 962.6 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 477.6 Mbps 962.8 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 477.6 Mbps 962.9 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 477.2 Mbps 962.1 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 477.5 Mbps 962.7 Kpps
And this is the same output with recycling enabled:
Overhead Shared Object Symbol
12.75% [mvpp2] [k] mvpp2_rx
9.56% [kernel] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
9.29% [kernel] [k] build_skb
9.27% [kernel] [k] eth_type_trans
8.39% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
7.85% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_free
7.36% [kernel] [k] page_pool_put_page
6.45% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive
4.72% [kernel] [k] __xdp_return
3.06% [kernel] [k] page_pool_refill_alloc_cache
With packet rate above 2000 Kpps:
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 1015 Mbps 2046 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 1015 Mbps 2047 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 1015 Mbps 2047 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 1015 Mbps 2047 Kpps
tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 1015 Mbps 2047 Kpps
The major performance increase is explained by the fact that the most CPU
consuming functions (page_pool_release_page, get_page_from_freelist
and free_unref_page) are no longer called on a per packet basis.
The test was done by sending to the macchiatobin 64 byte ethernet frames
with an invalid ethertype, so the packets are dropped early in the RX path.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
index ec706d614cac..633b39cfef65 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
@@ -3847,6 +3847,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
struct mvpp2_pcpu_stats ps = {};
enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
+ struct xdp_rxq_info *rxqi;
struct xdp_buff xdp;
int rx_received;
int rx_done = 0;
@@ -3912,15 +3913,15 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
else
frag_size = bm_pool->frag_size;
- if (xdp_prog) {
- struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq;
+ if (bm_pool->pkt_size == MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE)
+ rxqi = &rxq->xdp_rxq_short;
+ else
+ rxqi = &rxq->xdp_rxq_long;
- if (bm_pool->pkt_size == MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE)
- xdp_rxq = &rxq->xdp_rxq_short;
- else
- xdp_rxq = &rxq->xdp_rxq_long;
+ if (xdp_prog) {
+ xdp.rxq = rxqi;
- xdp_init_buff(&xdp, PAGE_SIZE, xdp_rxq);
+ xdp_init_buff(&xdp, PAGE_SIZE, rxqi);
xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, data,
MVPP2_MH_SIZE + MVPP2_SKB_HEADROOM,
rx_bytes, false);
@@ -3964,7 +3965,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
}
if (pp)
- page_pool_release_page(pp, virt_to_page(data));
+ skb_mark_for_recycle(skb, virt_to_page(data), &rxqi->mem);
else
dma_unmap_single_attrs(dev->dev.parent, dma_addr,
bm_pool->buf_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists