[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YG/11xcauoPY0sn+@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 08:36:07 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jianmin Wang <jianmin@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dzickus@...hat.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, omosnace@...hat.com, smueller@...onox.de,
stable@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] backports: crypto user - make NETLINK_CRYPTO work
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 07:11:48PM +0000, Jianmin Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 16:14 UTC, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 01:55:15PM +0000, Jianmin Wang wrote:
> > > There is same problem found in linux 4.19.y as upstream commit. The
> > > changes of crypto_user_* and cryptouser.h files from upstream patch are merged into
> > > crypto/crypto_user.c for backporting.
> > >
> > > Upstream commit:
> > > commit 91b05a7e7d8033a90a64f5fc0e3808db423e420a
> > > Author: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:11:24 +0200
> > >
> > > Currently, NETLINK_CRYPTO works only in the init network namespace. It
> > > doesn't make much sense to cut it out of the other network namespaces,
> > > so do the minor plumbing work necessary to make it work in any network
> > > namespace. Code inspired by net/core/sock_diag.c.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jianmin Wang <jianmin@...as.ac.cn>
> > > ---
> > > crypto/crypto_user.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > include/net/net_namespace.h | 3 +++
> > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > How does this change fit with the stable kernel rules? It looks to be a
> > new feature, if you need this, why not just use a newer kernel version?
> > What is preventing you from doing that?
> >
>
> This problem was found when we deployed new services on our container cluster,
> while the new services need to invoke libkcapi in the container environment.
>
> We have verified that the problem doesn't exist on newer kernel version.
> However, due to many services and the cluster running on many server machines
> whose host os are long-term linux distribution with linux 4.19 kernel, it will
> cost too much to migrate them to newer os with newer kernel version. This is
> why we need to fix the problem on linux 4.19.
But this is not a regression, but rather a "resolve an issue that has
never worked for new hardware", right?
And for that, moving to a new kernel seems like a wise thing to do to
me because we do not like backporting new features. Distro kernel are
of course, free to do that if they wish.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists