netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: enetc: fix array underflow in error handling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210409125554.vevm473y4oq2rjjq@skbuf>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:55:55 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:     Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: enetc: fix array underflow in error
 handling code

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:24:28PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This loop will try to unmap enetc_unmap_tx_buff[-1] and crash.
> 
> Fixes: 9d2b68cc108d ("net: enetc: add support for XDP_REDIRECT")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 57049ae97201..d86395775ed0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static int enetc_xdp_frame_to_xdp_tx_swbd(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring,
>  		dma = dma_map_single(tx_ring->dev, data, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  		if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(tx_ring->dev, dma))) {
>  			/* Undo the DMA mapping for all fragments */
> -			while (n-- >= 0)
> +			while (--n >= 0)
>  				enetc_unmap_tx_buff(tx_ring, &xdp_tx_arr[n]);
>  
>  			netdev_err(tx_ring->ndev, "DMA map error\n");
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

I have no idea what went wrong. I distinctly remember "testing" this by
writing up a small program:

#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
	int n = 5;

	while (n-- >= 0)
		printf("%d\n", n);

	return 0;
}

I find myself doing that most of the time when there is a need for an
unrolling loop. I do see that this goes down to -1, I wonder how I
missed it.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>