netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Multi-CPU DSA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210411200135.35fb5985@thinkpad>
Date:   Sun, 11 Apr 2021 20:01:35 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        zhang kai <zhangkaiheb@....com>,
        Weilong Chen <chenweilong@...wei.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Di Zhu <zhudi21@...wei.com>,
        Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Multi-CPU DSA support

On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +0200
Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> this is a respin of the Marek series in hope that this time we can
> finally make some progress with dsa supporting multi-cpu port.
> 
> This implementation is similar to the Marek series but with some tweaks.
> This adds support for multiple-cpu port but leave the driver the
> decision of the type of logic to use about assigning a CPU port to the
> various port. The driver can also provide no preference and the CPU port
> is decided using a round-robin way.

In the last couple of months I have been giving some thought to this
problem, and came up with one important thing: if there are multiple
upstream ports, it would make a lot of sense to dynamically reallocate
them to each user port, based on which user port is actually used, and
at what speed.

For example on Turris Omnia we have 2 CPU ports and 5 user ports. All
ports support at most 1 Gbps. Round-robin would assign:
  CPU port 0 - Port 0
  CPU port 1 - Port 1
  CPU port 0 - Port 2
  CPU port 1 - Port 3
  CPU port 0 - Port 4

Now suppose that the user plugs ethernet cables only into ports 0 and 2,
with 1, 3 and 4 free:
  CPU port 0 - Port 0 (plugged)
  CPU port 1 - Port 1 (free)
  CPU port 0 - Port 2 (plugged)
  CPU port 1 - Port 3 (free)
  CPU port 0 - Port 4 (free)

We end up in a situation where ports 0 and 2 share 1 Gbps bandwidth to
CPU, and the second CPU port is not used at all.

A mechanism for automatic reassignment of CPU ports would be ideal here.

What do you guys think?

Marek