netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] ionic: hwstamp tweaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5af0c4f1-82d6-a349-616d-0e92e10dd114@pensando.io>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:33:29 -0700
From:   Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] ionic: hwstamp tweaks

On 4/11/21 8:38 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:19:53PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> A few little changes after review comments and
>> additional internal testing.
> This series is a delta against the previously posted one.  Please
> follow the process by re-basing your changes into the original series,
> putting a "v2" into the Subject line, and adding a brief change log
> into the cover letter.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard

If the original patches hadn't already been pulled into net-next, this 
is what I would have done.  My understanding is that once the patches 
have been pulled into the repo that we need to do delta patches, not new 
versions of the same patch, as folks don't normally like changing 
published tree history.

sln