[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210412065710.Horde.HvZraNbocBxpaaNQLf6FJkk@www.vdorst.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:57:10 +0000
From: René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>
To: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for EEE features
Quoting DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>:
Hi Qingfang,
Thanks for the review.
> Hi René,
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:54 AM René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com> wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
>> @@ -2568,6 +2568,11 @@ static void
>> mt753x_phylink_mac_link_up(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> mcr |= PMCR_TX_FC_EN;
>> if (rx_pause)
>> mcr |= PMCR_RX_FC_EN;
>> +
>> + if (mode == MLO_AN_PHY && phydev &&
>> + !(priv->eee_disabled & BIT(port)) &&
>> + phy_init_eee(phydev, 0) >= 0)
>> + mcr |= PMCR_FORCE_EEE1G | PMCR_FORCE_EEE100;
>
> You should adjust this according to e->advertised.
I now better understand EEE part in phylink.
I refactor the code a lot and also tested with different
port with various eee-broken-1000t and eee-broken-100tx set
in the device tree.
Looking at mcr value, in all the cases the bit are set right.
>
>> }
>>
>> mt7530_set(priv, MT7530_PMCR_P(port), mcr);
>> @@ -2800,6 +2805,49 @@ mt753x_phy_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int
>> port, int regnum, u16 val)
>> return priv->info->phy_write(ds, port, regnum, val);
>> }
>>
>> +static int mt753x_get_mac_eee(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> + struct ethtool_eee *e)
>> +{
>> + struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
>> + u32 eeecr, pmsr;
>> +
>> + e->eee_enabled = !(priv->eee_disabled & BIT(port));
>> +
>> + if (e->eee_enabled) {
>> + eeecr = mt7530_read(priv, MT7530_PMEEECR_P(port));
>> + e->tx_lpi_enabled = !(eeecr & LPI_MODE_EN);
>> + e->tx_lpi_timer = GET_LPI_THRESH(eeecr);
>> + pmsr = mt7530_read(priv, MT7530_PMSR_P(port));
>> + e->eee_active = e->eee_enabled && !!(pmsr & PMSR_EEE1G);
>
> eee_enabled and eee_active will be set in phy_ethtool_get_eee, no need
> to set them here.
Thanks for pointing that out.
I refactor the code so it only set/report the LPI settings.
I already sended v2 with these changes.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mt753x_set_mac_eee(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> + struct ethtool_eee *e)
>> +{
>> + struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
>> + u32 eeecr;
>> +
>> + if (e->eee_enabled) {
>> + if (e->tx_lpi_timer > 0xFFF)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + priv->eee_disabled &= ~BIT(port);
>> + eeecr = mt7530_read(priv, MT7530_PMEEECR_P(port));
>> + eeecr &= ~(LPI_THRESH_MASK | LPI_MODE_EN);
>> + if (!e->tx_lpi_enabled)
>> + /* Force LPI Mode without a delay */
>> + eeecr |= LPI_MODE_EN;
>> + eeecr |= SET_LPI_THRESH(e->tx_lpi_timer);
>> + mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PMEEECR_P(port), eeecr);
>> + } else {
>> + priv->eee_disabled |= BIT(port);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
Greats,
René
Powered by blists - more mailing lists