netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] vduse: Introduce VDUSE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc9a90dd-4f86-988c-c1b5-ac606ce5e14b@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:16:13 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...onical.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, bcrl@...ck.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in
 Userspace


在 2021/4/9 下午4:02, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +struct vduse_dev_config_data {
>>>>> +     __u32 offset; /* offset from the beginning of config space */
>>>>> +     __u32 len; /* the length to read/write */
>>>>> +     __u8 data[VDUSE_CONFIG_DATA_LEN]; /* data buffer used to read/write */
>>>> Note that since VDUSE_CONFIG_DATA_LEN is part of uAPI it means we can
>>>> not change it in the future.
>>>>
>>>> So this might suffcient for future features or all type of virtio devices.
>>>>
>>> Do you mean 256 is no enough here？
>> Yes.
>>
> But this request will be submitted multiple times if config lengh is
> larger than 256. So do you think whether we need to extent the size to
> 512 or larger?


So I think you'd better either:

1) document the limitation (256) in somewhere, (better both uapi and doc)

or

2) make it variable

Thanks


>