[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54659eec-e315-5dc5-1578-d91633a80077@xen.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:55:36 +0100
From: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To: Michael Brown <mcb30@...e.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: xen-netback hotplug-status regression bug
On 13/04/2021 11:48, Michael Brown wrote:
> On 13/04/2021 08:12, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> If the frontend subsequently disconnects and reconnects (e.g.
>>> transitions through Closed->Initialising->Connected) then:
>>>
>>> - Nothing recreates "hotplug-status"
>>>
>>> - When the frontend re-enters Connected state, connect() sets up a
>>> watch on "hotplug-status" again
>>>
>>> - The callback hotplug_status_changed() is never triggered, and so
>>> the backend device never transitions to Connected state.
>>
>> That's not how I read it. Given that "hotplug-status" is removed by
>> the call to hotplug_status_changed() then the next call to connect()
>> should fail to register the watch and 'have_hotplug_status_watch'
>> should be 0. Thus backend_switch_state() should not defer the
>> transition to XenbusStateConnected in any subsequent interaction with
>> the frontend.
>
> Thank you for the reply. I've tested and confirmed my initial
> hypothesis: the call to xenbus_watch_pathfmt() succeeds even if the node
> does not exist.
>
> I confirmed this with ftrace using:
>
> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> echo function_graph > current_tracer
> echo set_backend_state > set_ftrace_filter
> echo xenbus_watch_pathfmt >> set_ftrace_filter
> echo register_xenbus_watch >> set_ftrace_filter
> echo xenbus_dev_fatal >> set_ftrace_filter
>
> On the second time that the frontend transitions to Connected, this
> produced the trace:
>
> set_backend_state [xen_netback]() {
> register_xenbus_watch();
> register_xenbus_watch();
> xenbus_watch_pathfmt() {
> register_xenbus_watch();
> }
> }
>
> which seems to confirm that the error path in xenbus_watch_path() is
> *not* taken, i.e. that the call to register_xenbus_watch() succeeded
> even though the node did not exist.
>
>
> Other observations also seem to confirm this behaviour:
>
> - Running "xenstore ls" in dom0 confirms that on the second frontend
> transition to Connected, the frontend state is indeed Connected (4) but
> the backend state remains in InitWait (2)
>
> - Running "xenstore watch
> /local/domain/0/backend/vif/<domU>/0/hotplug-status" *before* starting
> the domU confirms that it is possible to create a watch on a node that
> does not (yet) exist, and that the watch *is* notified when the node is
> later created.
>
>> Are you seeing the watch successfully re-registered even though the
>> node does not exist? Perhaps there has been a change in xenstore
>> behaviour?
>
> So, the TL;DR is that yes, the watch does successfully register even
> though the node does not exist.
>
> From a quick look through the xenstored source, it looks as though the
> only check on the node name is the call to is_valid_nodename(), which
> seems to perform a syntactic validity check only. I can't immediately
> find any commit that would have changed this behaviour.
>
Ok, so it sound like this was probably my misunderstanding of xenstore
semantics in the first place (although I'm sure I remember watch
registration failing for non-existent nodes at some point in the past...
that may have been with a non-upstream version of oxenstored though).
Anyway... a reasonable fix would therefore be to read the node first and
only register the watch if it does exist.
Paul
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists