[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYrK+TbYT6_rjZHjeDQ5Nea15Zk2JYU4Dqp_g8MPVup8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:29:22 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
"open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)"
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] libbpf: clarify flags in ringbuf helpers
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:25 PM Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...il.com> wrote:
>
> In 'bpf_ringbuf_reserve()' we require the flag to '0' at the moment.
>
> For 'bpf_ringbuf_{discard,submit,output}' a flag of '0' might send a
> notification to the process if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
> ---
Great, thanks! Applied to bpf-next.
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists